What is the difference between Compostable, Biodegradable and Degradable or Oxo-degradable?

If, like me, you really care about our war on waste and you frequently go searching for safe and sustainable products.  You might be surprised, by all of the technical terminology.  After all, I struggle with unpronounceable food additives, let alone everything else.

The wonderful Sue Allison-Rogers founder and owner of Eenee Designs has written an amazing article on the meaning of the terms, and the differences between compostable and biodegradable in relation to Australian Standards.  You can locate her original article here .  While the article references the use within bags, it is relevant to nappies as well.

Eenee nappies use a compostable biofilm made from renewable resources that can be composted within a single compost cycle with no plastic contamination to organics and form the insert in Botanic Baby Compostable Nappy Service.

Full extract below:

Compostable vs Biodegradable:  What is the difference between Compostable, Biodegradable and Degradable or Oxo-degradable?


The terms biodegradation, biodegradable materials and compostability are often misused.  Other terms used are degradable or oxo-degradable which few people understand the differences, leading to confusion in the market place.

Degradable or oxo-degradable describe where the traditional plastics, such as polyethylene are treated with additives, usually consisting of calcium carbonate and heavy metals which causes the material to disintegrate over a number of years.  Degradable bags do not 'compost' when composting, and will contaminate the end compost reducing its value or limiting its use.  Imagine the look of your bag of gardening compost full of bits of plastic. 

Similarly degradable bags will contaminate any recyclable plastics feedstock, causing great damage to a material which should be able to be recycled over and over again.  Just imagine if degradable bags make it into your recycled decking material where it could reduce its life considerably.

Misuse of the terms compostable and biodegradable can lead buyers to costly mistakes.  Some countries have now moved to ban the use of the word biodegradable on packaging, as there is little benefit if the end product still ends up in landfill.  Products may be described as compostable provided they conform to accepted standards.



Concern raised by the compost industry, which was faced with materials that claimed to be biodegradable or compostable, led to the development of the European Standard EN 13432 which lays down criteria for what can or cannot be described as compostable and what can be called biodegradable.  The US Standard ASTM D6400-99 sets out similar standards.  European Standard EN13432 is the basis of the ISO Standard.  These standards are intended to ensure that the materials will break down in industrial composting conditions.

Materials that meet either the European or US Standard will break down effectively in virtually all composting systems.  The Australian Standard AS4736-2006 is closely based on EN13432.  The main difference is the addition of a worm eco-toxicity test.



Each of these points is needed to meet the definition of compostability, but each point alone is not sufficient.  For example, a biodegradable material is not necessarily compostable because it must also break up during one composting cycle.  On the other hand, a material that breaks up, over one composting cycle, into microscopic pieces that are not totally biodegradable, is not compostable.  So compostable material must possess the following characteristics:

Biodegradability:  measured by metabolic conversion of the material to carbon dioxide to at least 90% in less than six months. (90% is used to account for sampling error, not to allow for non biodegradable material). 

Disintegrability:  there should be fragmentation below a certain size with no visible contamination.  This is tested by composting the materials for three months then screening through a 2mm sieve.  The mass of residues above 2mm must be less than 10% of the original mass. 

Absence of negative effects on the final compost:  This is tested by a plant growth test and physical/chemical analyses.  There must be no difference from the control compost. 

Other chemical/physical parameters that must not be different from those of the control compost after the degradation are: the pH, salinity, volatile solids, Nitrogen, Phosphorous, Magnesium and Potassium.

AS4736 adds a worm eco-toxicity test to the plant and chemical tests.

Low levels of heavy metals: Less than a list of specified values of certain elements.



ZERO, any plastic contamination is too much.  Imagine 5% plastic in the organic feedstock, this becomes 7 to 8% in the finished compost as the plastic stays the same, while the organic matter biodegrades around it.  After 1 to 2 years following application to the garden, then this could increase to 20% as again the plastic stays the same and the compost breaks down around it until eventually you only have plastic left.  Add some more contaminated compost and the plastic accumulation becomes a very obvious problem.

Sue Allison-Rodgers
Founder Owner
Eenee Designs